The outcomes belong to the trial teams. We produced the visuals they used.
Other matters include McRO, Inc. v. Bandai Namco Games America (patent) and The State v. Oscar Pistorius (criminal defense). Most of our work is under protective order and cannot be shown. Ask us about experience in your practice area.
All results →Experts revise, rulings come down, theories shift. Here is how a change moves through our studio, who does what, and where you keep control.
Timing depends on the change and, for animation, on render time. We agree the schedule for each matter at the start, working back from your dates.
The two people you speak with before you retain us are the two people who run your matter.
We start from what the fact-finder must understand, remember and decide. The format follows from that, not the other way around.
We develop your concept, propose approaches you may not have considered, or execute exactly as directed. Your theory of the case sets the direction.
We plan backward from the hearing or trial date and tell you at the start what fits in the time available.
A budget you can explain to your client, agreed before production starts.
You approve both before production starts. No open-ended engagements.
Each phase is prepaid, which puts your dates on our production calendar.
Changes within the original scope are part of the price.
New visuals, major redesigns or added scenarios are quoted and approved before we start them.
If the timeline is compressed, you know the rate before you decide.
Sealed and confidential material is handled on the terms of your protective order. A first conversation needs none of it.